<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mitts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.barnabasmonkeypants.com/2008/11/mitts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.barnabasmonkeypants.com/2008/11/mitts/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=mitts</link>
	<description>All the monkeyness, without the tail</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 23:11:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://www.barnabasmonkeypants.com/2008/11/mitts/comment-page-1/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barnabasmonkeypants.com/?p=344#comment-271</guid>
		<description>Pants without back pockets aren&#039;t very flattering. They do weird things to the bum region. And back pockets conceal panty lines. Of course there&#039;s really no hiding a diaper line, is there. Or do they have thong diapers now? I shudder to think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pants without back pockets aren&#8217;t very flattering. They do weird things to the bum region. And back pockets conceal panty lines. Of course there&#8217;s really no hiding a diaper line, is there. Or do they have thong diapers now? I shudder to think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jensational</title>
		<link>http://www.barnabasmonkeypants.com/2008/11/mitts/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Jensational</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 02:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barnabasmonkeypants.com/?p=344#comment-270</guid>
		<description>Yes!  The pockets I can kind of understand because they have an aesthetic appeal.  Otherwise it would look like the babies are in sweatpants 24/7 and that&#039;s sort of slovenly. But belt loops?  I think that baby belts would be a major choking hazard if they existed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes!  The pockets I can kind of understand because they have an aesthetic appeal.  Otherwise it would look like the babies are in sweatpants 24/7 and that&#8217;s sort of slovenly. But belt loops?  I think that baby belts would be a major choking hazard if they existed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

